In That
In That

In That

If You Think
If You Think

If You Think

Equal
Equal

Equal

If You
If You

If You

Well In That Case
Well In That Case

Well In That Case

Its
Its

Its

Sent
Sent

Sent

The
The

The

That
That

That

see
 see

see

🔥 | Latest

In That Case: electrifyingnight: imaghosttown: kradeiz: arrghigiveup: gale-of-the-nomads: notsomerryerry: chabbit: bulbasaur-propaganda: Growing up with your starters Artist:  esasi8794 / Twitter The captions are also really cute, although they mostly describe what’s in each photo: Bulbasaur: Somehow, nomming on my clothes… has become a weird habit of theirs. Venusaur: That hasn’t changed now that they’ve grown, but they’re very gentle. Charmander: It’s my first attempt, but I made a plushie so that he wouldn’t get lonely. Charizard: That plushie seems to be his favorite even now. Squirtle: Squirtle’s a bit timid and hides behind me at the smallest things. Blastoise: Looks like they’re scared of the first Pichu they’ve seen. You’re not really hiding! @noelle217 This is adorable They just posted some more! [source] And some more! “They like to fawn around like a spoiled kid between my arms”   “Since they got big, They’ve become bold.” “They hold my hands, playfully touching.”“He’s not obedient, he touches my hands when I sleep/nap.” “They seek attention when I’m sulking.”“Now they’re big, they do it unwaveringly, but, It’s a little cute…” “When they worry, they wrap (their tail) around things.”“Since becoming big, they’re restrained.”  “When it’s attention time, they take their place in my clothes.” “Uh,,, my clothes,, oh you’re so happy, well, in that case it’s good…” “They hold out a pretty flower for me.”“Today, they held out a (spring flower?) to me. Thanks!!”  Thank you for the updated translations!
In That Case: electrifyingnight:

imaghosttown:


kradeiz:

arrghigiveup:

gale-of-the-nomads:

notsomerryerry:

chabbit:

bulbasaur-propaganda:

Growing up with your starters
Artist: 

esasi8794 / Twitter

The captions are also really cute, although they mostly describe what’s in each photo:
Bulbasaur: Somehow, nomming on my clothes… has become a weird habit of theirs.
Venusaur: That hasn’t changed now that they’ve grown, but they’re very gentle.
Charmander: It’s my first attempt, but I made a plushie so that he wouldn’t get lonely.
Charizard: That plushie seems to be his favorite even now.
Squirtle: Squirtle’s a bit timid and hides behind me at the smallest things.
Blastoise: Looks like they’re scared of the first Pichu they’ve seen. You’re not really hiding!



@noelle217 



This is adorable 

They just posted some more!
[source]

And some more! 

“They like to fawn around like a spoiled kid between my arms”   “Since they got big, They’ve become bold.”
“They hold my hands, playfully touching.”“He’s not obedient, he touches my hands when I sleep/nap.”
“They seek attention when I’m sulking.”“Now they’re big, they do it unwaveringly, but, It’s a little cute…”

“When they worry, they wrap (their tail) around things.”“Since becoming big, they’re restrained.” 
“When it’s attention time, they take their place in my clothes.” “Uh,,, my clothes,, oh you’re so happy, well, in that case it’s good…”
“They hold out a pretty flower for me.”“Today, they held out a (spring flower?) to me. Thanks!!” 



Thank you for the updated translations!

electrifyingnight: imaghosttown: kradeiz: arrghigiveup: gale-of-the-nomads: notsomerryerry: chabbit: bulbasaur-propaganda: Growi...

In That Case: In that case mine is always full.
In That Case: In that case mine is always full.

In that case mine is always full.

In That Case: Tos pm Telstra 0 Can your job pay trom my crack addiction. Il be your friend or A more if you want to? Only if my repayment is you fuel my crack addiction My address is 122 Thomas St. Dandenong Vic 3175 So how did you want me to sneak in?l assume they've got guards around the place Dress up as a ninja turtle and tell them your here to entertain me And than give me my crack so we can smoke together. I know a place Send Typea esage 705 pm Telstra 0 Okay but which one?1 think if came as the wrong one it' blow our cover Attention to detail is how we pull this off Raphaet Iike em tough Rough Only if I can tie you up using my red face mask smoke your pipe if you do go through with tying me up. And maybe even do more if you play your moves correctly In that case when do you want me there by Tre eage Send Tatatre 40 708 pm 3am wear your best jocks Kidding me?i won't be weanng any Much better expect you to be already undressed when t get there as we may heed to move quickly I only fuck with socks on. Miss me with that gay shit m I can work with that Remember though for payment t need my fair share of your crack I thought your bringing the crack Type mesage Send Teletra 0 106 pm bring the crack But i want your ass as my payment Oh you'll have that in spades Perfect. Sounds lika a fine date to me see you there So who are you really Lmao Some bloke on her tryn to catfish some mother fuckers I'm a Nigerian prince just here to have some fun Typeeage Send Telstre 40 706 pm 12% Must be pretty rich then d Are you actually addicted to crack? Fuck no. Woukdr't even have the taintest of idea of where to get it Are you? I got peer pressured to smoke sum in year 7 haven't been the same since Should definitely see someone bout it Shit fucks your ife up which I'm sure you've found out Ive been clean for about 3 years now but considered doing it A again after my recent break up Tye a meage Send Tatutre 40 708 pm now Dur consIoerea aong it again after my recent break up Nah nah don't do it. 3 years is an accomplishment a lot of peosle dream of achieving Honestly, if that's actualy you in that photo (which r'm highly doubiting nether less), they're missing out big time. Thank you for our conversation. You're a genuine guy and I hope you do find someone who likes you for you. Don't give up on love! Thank you very much, appreciate that Good luck with everything for you ype age Send Don’t do crack kids
In That Case: Tos pm
 Telstra 0
 Can your job pay trom my crack
 addiction. Il be your friend or
 A more if you want to?
 Only if my repayment is you fuel
 my crack addiction
 My address is 122 Thomas St.
 Dandenong Vic 3175
 So how did you want me to sneak
 in?l assume they've got guards
 around the place
 Dress up as a ninja turtle and tell
 them your here to entertain me
 And than give me my crack so
 we can smoke together. I know a
 place
 Send
 Typea esage
 705 pm
 Telstra 0
 Okay but which one?1 think if
 came as the wrong one it' blow
 our cover
 Attention to detail is how we pull
 this off
 Raphaet Iike em tough
 Rough
 Only if I can tie you up using my
 red face mask
 smoke your pipe if you do go
 through with tying me up. And
 maybe even do more if you play
 your moves correctly
 In that case when do you want
 me there by
 Tre eage
 Send
 Tatatre 40
 708 pm
 3am wear your best jocks
 Kidding me?i won't be weanng
 any
 Much better
 expect you to be already
 undressed when t get there as
 we may heed to move quickly
 I only fuck with socks on. Miss
 me with that gay shit
 m
 I can work with that
 Remember though for payment t
 need my fair share of your crack
 I thought your bringing the crack
 Type mesage
 Send
 Teletra 0
 106 pm
 bring the crack
 But i want your ass as my
 payment
 Oh you'll have that in spades
 Perfect. Sounds lika a fine date
 to me
 see you there
 So who are you really Lmao
 Some bloke on her tryn to
 catfish some mother fuckers
 I'm a Nigerian prince just here to
 have some fun
 Typeeage
 Send
 Telstre 40
 706 pm
 12%
 Must be pretty rich then d
 Are you actually addicted to
 crack?
 Fuck no. Woukdr't even have the
 taintest of idea of where to get it
 Are you?
 I got peer pressured to smoke
 sum in year 7 haven't been the
 same since
 Should definitely see someone
 bout it Shit fucks your ife up
 which I'm sure you've found out
 Ive been clean for about 3 years
 now but considered doing it
 A again after my recent break up
 Tye a meage
 Send
 Tatutre 40
 708 pm
 now Dur consIoerea aong it
 again after my recent break up
 Nah nah don't do it. 3 years is an
 accomplishment a lot of peosle
 dream of achieving
 Honestly, if that's actualy you in
 that photo (which r'm highly
 doubiting nether less), they're
 missing out big time.
 Thank you for our conversation.
 You're a genuine guy and I hope
 you do find someone who likes
 you for you. Don't give up on
 love!
 Thank you very much,
 appreciate that
 Good luck with everything for
 you
 ype age
 Send
Don’t do crack kids

Don’t do crack kids

In That Case: 11:50 Add Question Q Quora Notifs Home Open Qs More FRitam Chatterjee upvoted this 19 Nov I like girl A. We are very good friends. A's best friend B likes me. Also, A likes a guy C who is my best bro and C likes another girl D who is in a relationship with another guy. What should we do? Priyanka Dhaka 10.7k upvotes by Ritam Chatterjee, Mukesh Sharma, (more) You can apply Bipartite Matching algorithm of Graph Theory. All you have to do is: 1. Put all girls as vertices (a's) in Part A, and boys as vertices (b's) in Part B. 2. Draw an edge between vertex a to vertex b if a likes b. 3. It will be a bipartite graph (there are no edges within vertices of Part A, and same for Part B) unless your friends are not straight. 4. Then find maximum matching for this bipartite graph. (refer this link Maximum Bipartite Matching-GeeksforGeeks) 5. You will get maximum matching as output and the matched edges will be the pairs who should be together. 6. You can apply weighted bipartite matching algorithm if you know how much they love/like each other. In that case, assign weights according to their amount of love. and repeat step 4 and 5. Thanks for asking this question. Finally I have found a real life problem which can be solved by what Prof Panda has been teaching us for 2-3 years. P.S.I can provide you code for both weighted and unweighted maximum bipartite matching which I made for my project. Updated 28 Jul. Graph Theory can Save Relationships
In That Case: 11:50
 Add Question Q
 Quora
 Notifs
 Home
 Open Qs
 More
 FRitam Chatterjee upvoted this 19 Nov
 I like girl A. We are very good friends. A's best friend B
 likes me. Also, A likes a guy C who is my best bro and
 C likes another girl D who is in a relationship with
 another guy. What should we do?
 Priyanka Dhaka
 10.7k upvotes by Ritam Chatterjee, Mukesh Sharma, (more)
 You can apply Bipartite Matching algorithm of Graph Theory.
 All you have to do is:
 1. Put all girls as vertices (a's) in Part A, and boys as vertices
 (b's) in Part B.
 2. Draw an edge between vertex a to vertex b if a likes b.
 3. It will be a bipartite graph (there are no edges within
 vertices of Part A, and same for Part B) unless your friends
 are not straight.
 4. Then find maximum matching for this bipartite graph. (refer
 this link Maximum Bipartite Matching-GeeksforGeeks)
 5. You will get maximum matching as output and the matched
 edges will be the pairs who should be together.
 6. You can apply weighted bipartite matching algorithm if you
 know how much they love/like each other. In that case,
 assign weights according to their amount of love. and repeat
 step 4 and 5.
 Thanks for asking this question. Finally I have found a real life
 problem which can be solved by what Prof Panda has been
 teaching us for 2-3 years.
 P.S.I can provide you code for both weighted and unweighted
 maximum bipartite matching which I made for my project.
 Updated 28 Jul.
Graph Theory can Save Relationships

Graph Theory can Save Relationships

In That Case: factfiction emiliusthegreat Follow partybarackisinthehousetonight releases pack of dads into home depot* go....be free hotcommunist invasive species encroach on lesbian territory dreaming-shark This is a common misconception because they're such similar environments, but you should be aware that dads are native to Home Depot, while lesbians are actually native to Lowe's. At this point, however, both dads and lesbians have made themselves at home in both Home Depot and Lowe's to the point that trying to separate them back into their original ranges would probably do more harm than good to the delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores. ailithnight A properly raised and socialized Dad will be perfectly comfort- able cohabiting with Lesbians. Its not really "encroaching on another's territory". You wouldn't say that about foxes in a forest that also homes bobcats, would you? No. It's just two different species that have both evolved to live in similar/the same environment. As long as they recognize each other as equals, Dads and Lesbians are more than capable of cohabitation. Now, if you were to release a pack of Lumberjacks into a or Home Depot, that's where chaos will reign. Being adap far harsher and more demanding environment, the Lumberjacks would simply push Dads and Lesbians both out and also consume far more than a sustainable amount of resources. It would be like releasing bears at a country club. chequerootlurks As a former timber-harveste... I feel this is potentially accurate in theory. But highly improbable in actuality. Lumberjacks, like most megafauna species generally require more space than the average hardware store, even a big box store could provide. The misconception is that Lumberjacks are a social species because of how they often work and live together. This is a matter of necessity, not preference, and a survival technique for thriving under the Log Boss. A "pack" of Lumberjacks, if not under the environmental pressure of a Log Boss will naturally disperse until they each have a wide territory Lumberjacks rarely fight for territory. One on one, a Lumberjack could drive out a Dad or Lesbian, however the latter tend to travel in social packs. Lumberjacks will passively retreat on the presence of large numbers of people. Kind of like Sasquatch Getting a "pack" of Lumberjacks assembled would be hard enough unless they were forced into a Hardware Store by a LogBoss. In that case, they would already be in a heightened and potentially agitated state far above their natural behavior. This artificial scenario can be likened to a circus animal running amok If it had been in the wild, the incident would not have occurred. Free-roaming Lumberjacks are the cryptids of the Hardware system. They are surprisingly quiet and unobtrusive Please stop labeling Lumberjacks as dangerous roving social predators. They are intermediate level omnivores and remarkably peaceful unless threatened. katy-l-wood As a hardware store worker I can say that this is all 100% accurate. The delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores
In That Case: factfiction
 emiliusthegreat Follow
 partybarackisinthehousetonight
 releases pack of dads into home depot* go....be free
 hotcommunist
 invasive species encroach on lesbian territory
 dreaming-shark
 This is a common misconception because they're such similar
 environments, but you should be aware that dads are native to
 Home Depot, while lesbians are actually native to Lowe's. At this
 point, however, both dads and lesbians have made themselves at
 home in both Home Depot and Lowe's to the point that trying to
 separate them back into their original ranges would probably do
 more harm than good to the delicate ecosystem of large chain
 hardware stores.
 ailithnight
 A properly raised and socialized Dad will be perfectly comfort-
 able cohabiting with Lesbians. Its not really "encroaching on
 another's territory". You wouldn't say that about foxes in a forest
 that also homes bobcats, would you? No. It's just two different
 species that have both evolved to live in similar/the same
 environment. As long as they recognize each other as equals,
 Dads and Lesbians are more than capable of cohabitation.
 Now, if you were to release a pack of Lumberjacks into a
 or Home Depot, that's where chaos will reign. Being adap
 far harsher and more demanding environment, the Lumberjacks
 would simply push Dads and Lesbians both out and also
 consume far more than a sustainable amount of resources. It
 would be like releasing bears at a country club.
 chequerootlurks
 As a former timber-harveste... I feel this is potentially accurate in
 theory. But highly improbable in actuality.
 Lumberjacks, like most megafauna species generally require
 more space than the average hardware store, even a big box
 store could provide. The misconception is that Lumberjacks are a
 social species because of how they often work and live together.
 This is a matter of necessity, not preference, and a survival
 technique for thriving under the Log Boss.
 A "pack" of Lumberjacks, if not under the environmental
 pressure of a Log Boss will naturally disperse until they each have
 a wide territory
 Lumberjacks rarely fight for territory.
 One on one, a Lumberjack could drive out a Dad or Lesbian,
 however the latter tend to travel in social packs.
 Lumberjacks will passively retreat on the presence of large
 numbers of people. Kind of like Sasquatch
 Getting a "pack" of Lumberjacks assembled would be hard
 enough unless they were forced into a Hardware Store by a
 LogBoss. In that case, they would already be in a heightened and
 potentially agitated state far above their natural behavior. This
 artificial scenario can be likened to a circus animal running amok
 If it had been in the wild, the incident would not have occurred.
 Free-roaming Lumberjacks are the cryptids of the Hardware
 system. They are surprisingly quiet and unobtrusive
 Please stop labeling Lumberjacks as dangerous roving social
 predators. They are intermediate level omnivores and remarkably
 peaceful unless threatened.
 katy-l-wood
 As a hardware store worker I can say that this is all 100%
 accurate.
The delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores

The delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores

In That Case: Today, 2 May 2017, marks the 19th anniversary of the Battle of Hogwarts,during which lves were lost and hearts were broken imeparably.Aho good teiumphed over evil and al was well and stulf But most importantly, the deaths And it's become kindol a tradtion in recent years for JK Rowing to apologise, on the anniversary of their death, foe killing off one af the charecters who died during the battle iJ.K Rowling Today I would just like to say: I'm really sorry about Fred. "Bows head in acceptance of your reasonable ire 8,955 54,970 Back in 2015, she apologised for kiling Fred Weasley And I thinkl can speak for all of us when I say: It'ssNnotOK№ Last year, she epologised for kiling Bernus Lupn Also not OK you're wondering 1JK. Rowling Arthur Ived, so Lupin had to de. Im sorry. Iddnt enjoy doing t The only sme my ecnor ever saw me cry was over the fate o Toddy. 37 PM-2May 2016 h 17 33,449 64210 And the tradtion lives on because JK.just tweeted an apology for another death Who could in be? I hear you ary OK, here it is. Please don't start flame wars over it, but this year ld ike to apologise for kiling whispers). Snape. "runs for cover 32,442 74,689 ALWAYS And, Ox some people love Snape and were sad when he died ka Pdont star fans wars over & butis year Td K rowing Why wouid you even bring that up? 18 PM-2May 201 ®İX.rowing m sti very sad about but hanks for the apolagy 31 PM 2 May 21 and miss him everyday But mostly people just think, in that case justice was served, And there are characters more deserving of apologies. ,e s Plse on' t wars over t.bur thi d Joanne Harris V Follow 2 May 2017 k rowing you realy ciantneed to apo ogise for that one t's 11 PM-2 Moy 2017 start fane wans emma lord k rowing I'd like to apolog e louder on your behaor one Lty Evara Potter 2PM-2 May 8017 Waits patiently until next year, wen someone more deserving cf an apology will be remembered.Whet do you think Is Snape deserving of an apology,or did he get what was coming to him o have Your nnother S J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year
In That Case: Today, 2 May 2017, marks the 19th anniversary of the Battle of
 Hogwarts,during which lves were lost and hearts were broken
 imeparably.Aho good teiumphed over evil and al was well and stulf
 But most importantly, the deaths
 And it's become kindol a tradtion in recent years for JK Rowing to
 apologise, on the anniversary of their death, foe killing off one af the
 charecters who died during the battle
 iJ.K Rowling
 Today I would just like to say: I'm really sorry
 about Fred. "Bows head in acceptance of your
 reasonable ire
 8,955 54,970
 Back in 2015, she apologised for kiling Fred Weasley And I thinkl can
 speak for all of us when I say: It'ssNnotOK№
 Last year, she epologised for kiling Bernus Lupn Also not OK
 you're wondering
 1JK. Rowling
 Arthur Ived, so Lupin had to de. Im sorry. Iddnt enjoy doing t
 The only sme my ecnor ever saw me cry was over the fate o
 Toddy.
 37 PM-2May 2016
 h 17 33,449 64210
 And the tradtion lives on because JK.just tweeted an apology for
 another death Who could in be? I hear you ary
 OK, here it is. Please don't start flame wars over
 it, but this year ld ike to apologise for kiling
 whispers). Snape. "runs for cover
 32,442 74,689
 ALWAYS
 And, Ox some people love Snape and were sad when he died
 ka
 Pdont star fans wars over & butis year Td
 K rowing Why wouid you even bring that
 up?
 18 PM-2May 201
 ®İX.rowing m sti very sad about
 but hanks for the apolagy
 31 PM 2 May 21
 and
 miss him everyday
 But mostly people just think, in that case justice was served, And
 there are characters more deserving of apologies.
 ,e s Plse on' t wars over t.bur thi
 d
 Joanne Harris
 V Follow
 2 May 2017
 k rowing you realy ciantneed to apo ogise for that one t's
 11 PM-2 Moy 2017
 start fane wans
 emma lord
 k rowing I'd like to apolog e louder on your behaor one
 Lty Evara Potter
 2PM-2 May 8017
 Waits patiently until next year, wen someone more deserving cf an
 apology will be remembered.Whet do you think Is Snape deserving
 of an apology,or did he get what was coming to him
 o have
 Your
 nnother S
J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year

J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year

In That Case: I's photo. Ishared I love his reasoning - perfect! C.S. Lewis on Reasoning to Atheism "Supposing there was no intelligence behind the universe, no creative mind. In that case, nobody designed my brain for the purpose of thinking. It is merely that when the atoms inside my skull happen, for physical or chemical reasons, to arrange themselves in a certain way, this gives me, as a by-product, the sensation I call thought. But, if so, how can I trust my own thinking to be true? it's like upsetting a milk jug and hoping that the way it splashes itself will give you a map of London. But if I can't trust my own thinking, of course I can't trust the arguments leading to Atheism, and therefore have no reason to be an Atheist, or anything else. Unless I believe in God, I cannot believe in thought: so I can never use thought to disbelieve in God." -C.S. Lewis The Case for Christionity,p 32 | this is great!! Like · Comment · Unfollow post · Share · 20:04 (about a minute ago) · 12 Except that the brain is not just a random jumble of chemical and physical components of which thinking is a random by- product. It is the result of millions of years of adaptation and honing. As we don't have big daws, natural armor or wings, humans rely on thinking for survival. If there were massive errors in the way we process information and make judgements upon which our survival hangs, we wouldn't be able to live and reproduce, and thus the human race would not exist. 20:15 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply |We can rely on our thinking to be true by observing the world, forming a hypothesis, testing it and looking at the results. If the results differ from our hypothesis, we adjust our thinking to account for the new information. If the results match our hypothesis, then our thinking was accurate. Huzzuh! 20:19 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply Write a comment... theamericanatheistblog: Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheist Comedy/Humor Christian apologetics of the evidentialist kind rely on scientific ignorance and appeal to mystery
In That Case: I's photo.
 Ishared
 I love his reasoning - perfect!
 C.S. Lewis on Reasoning to Atheism
 "Supposing there was no intelligence behind the universe, no
 creative mind. In that case, nobody designed my brain for the
 purpose of thinking. It is merely that when the atoms inside my
 skull happen, for physical or chemical reasons, to arrange
 themselves in a certain way, this gives me, as a by-product, the
 sensation I call thought. But, if so, how can I trust my own
 thinking to be true? it's like upsetting a milk jug and hoping that
 the way it splashes itself will give you a map of London. But if I
 can't trust my own thinking, of course I can't trust the arguments
 leading to Atheism, and therefore have no reason to be an
 Atheist, or anything else. Unless I believe in God, I cannot believe in thought: so I can
 never use thought to disbelieve in God."
 -C.S. Lewis
 The Case for Christionity,p 32
 | this is great!!
 Like · Comment · Unfollow post · Share · 20:04 (about a minute ago) · 12
 Except that the brain is not just a random jumble of
 chemical and physical components of which thinking is a random by-
 product. It is the result of millions of years of adaptation and honing.
 As we don't have big daws, natural armor or wings, humans rely on
 thinking for survival. If there were massive errors in the way we
 process information and make judgements upon which our survival
 hangs, we wouldn't be able to live and reproduce, and thus the
 human race would not exist.
 20:15 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply
 |We can rely on our thinking to be true by observing
 the world, forming a hypothesis, testing it and looking at the results.
 If the results differ from our hypothesis, we adjust our thinking to
 account for the new information. If the results match our
 hypothesis, then our thinking was accurate. Huzzuh!
 20:19 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply
 Write a comment...
theamericanatheistblog:

Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheist Comedy/Humor

Christian apologetics of the evidentialist kind rely on scientific ignorance and appeal to mystery

theamericanatheistblog: Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheis...